Section C: Reading Comprehension
Passage One
Passage Two
Answers & Explanations
Passage One: The Reality of Online Classes
46. B。解析:题干问作者对参加在线课程的学生有什么看法。第三段首句明确指出:First of all, students lack the desire to learn(首先,学生缺乏学习的渴望),对应 B 选项 (They are unmotivated to learn 他们没有学习的动力)。
47. A。解析:题干问作者认为在线课程的作业怎么样。第四段指出:They are not designed for students to interact with the material in depth but designed to be graded easily(它们的设计目的不是让学生深入研究材料,而是为了容易评分),对应 A 选项 (They are made convenient to mark 它们被设计成方便批改的)。
48. D。解析:题干问作者指出的在线课程的一个缺点是什么。第六段指出:There is also little interaction amongst students. It can be harder for students to create study groups and form relationships with their peers(学生之间也很少互动。学生更难建立学习小组和与同伴建立关系),对应 D 选项 (They provide little chance for students to build relationships with each other 它们很少给学生提供建立相互关系的机会)。
49. C。解析:题干问如果课程放到线上,可能会产生什么问题。第七段指出:Not all students have access to these types of resources, whether it is for financial or other reasons, and some students can be put at a disadvantage(不是所有学生都能获得这些资源——指电脑和网络——无论是因为经济还是其他原因,一些学生可能会处于劣势),说明部分学生无法顺利上课,对应 C 选项 (Some students may have difficulty attending them 一些学生可能有困难参加它们)。
50. D。解析:题干问作者认为什么构成了真正教育的关键部分。最后一段指出:they fail to provide a genuine education with an emphasis on convenience rather than critical thinking(他们未能提供真正的教育,因为他们强调便利而不是批判性思维),反过来说真正的教育应该强调批判性思维,对应 D 选项 (Cultivation of analytical thinking ability 分析性思维能力的培养)。
Passage Two: Public Debate in Science
51. A。解析:题干问作者认为公开辩论能带来什么。第一段末尾指出:helps the public observe the process of scientific discourse more clearly—then this is good for everyone(帮助公众更清晰地观察科学论述的过程——这对所有人都有好处),对应 A 选项 (Help the public to better understand science 帮助公众更好地理解科学)。
52. B。解析:题干问为什么最近发表在《纽约时报》上的辩论引起了专家的担忧。第二段末尾指出:But some experts worried that such public speculation might lead people to believe that disagreement about the details meant a lack of adequate scientific consensus over the safety and efficiency of modern-day medicine(但一些专家担心,这种公开推测可能会让人们认为...在现代医学的安全性和有效性上缺乏足够的科学共识),即让公众产生怀疑,对应 B 选项 (It might breed public distrust in modern medicine 它可能会滋生公众对现代医学的不信任)。
53. C。解析:题干问作者为什么说一些专家的焦虑似乎是错位的(misplaced)。第三段紧接着解释了原因:These days, the public can access debates about science regardless of where they take place(如今,无论科学辩论在哪里发生,公众都可以接触到它们),意思是无论专家担不担心,辩论已经公开化了,对应 C 选项 (Debates about science are accessible to the public anyway 关于科学的辩论无论如何公众都能接触到)。
54. B。解析:题干问作者建议科学家对公开辩论采取什么态度。最后一段指出:rather than avoiding such conversations, let the debates be transparent and vigorous(与其回避这样的对话,不如让辩论变得透明和充满活力),意思是应该接受它,对应 B 选项 (Embrace it with open arms 张开双臂拥抱它)。
55. C。解析:题干问作者在最后一段对科学的看法是什么。最后一段指出:If the public is to understand that science is an honorably self-correcting process, the idea that science is a fixed set of facts in a textbook needs to be dismissed(如果公众要理解科学是一个光荣的自我纠正过程,那么把科学看成是教科书上一套固定事实的想法就需要被摒弃),对应 C 选项 (It is a dynamic and self-improving process 它是一个动态和自我完善的过程)。
核心搭配与高分句型
【核心搭配与高频短语】
- at one's own pace:按照自己的节奏(learn the material at their own pace)
- engage with:参与,融入,与...建立联系(engage with the course material)
- in depth:深入地(interact with the material in depth)
- put sb. at a disadvantage:使某人处于劣势(some students can be put at a disadvantage)
- move beyond:超越,超出(move beyond the halls of universities)
- breed distrust:滋生不信任(breed public distrust in modern medicine)
- misplaced anxiety:错位的焦虑 / 不必要的担忧
- regardless of:不管,不顾(regardless of where they take place)
- self-correcting process:自我纠正的过程
- come under attack:受到攻击 / 受到质疑(validity of science coming under attack)
【亮点句型解析】
- rather than 引导的对比结构:
"...they simply complete their assignments to receive credit for a passing grade rather than genuinely engage with the course material."
(...他们只是完成作业以获得及格的学分,而不是真正地参与到课程材料中去。)在四级写作中,使用 `rather than` 可以非常清晰地对比“做了什么”和“应该做却没做的事”,逻辑严密。 - 倒装句 (Gone are...):
"Gone are the days of going to a conference and debating scientific issues..."
(去参加会议辩论科学问题的日子已经一去不复返了...)主语是 `the days`,过去分词 `Gone` 提前构成完全倒装,句式生动,强烈地表达了“旧时代已逝”的感叹,是极佳的加分句型。