Section B: Information Matching
Directions: In this section, you are going to read a passage with ten statements attached to it. Each statement contains information given in one of the paragraphs. Identify the paragraph from which the information is derived. You may choose a paragraph more than once. Each paragraph is marked with a letter. Answer the questions by marking the corresponding letter on your Answer Sheet.
Why it's wrong to look at work-life balance as an achievement
[A] Few topics have been so endlessly analysed as work-life balance. The quest to attain this mysterious state has dominated discussion around careers for years—especially for working parents. The concept is often presented as something to achieve, or a goal to reach. And once you've reached it, congratulations: you've made it; you're a successful human being of the 21st century.
[B] But the problem is that we often tell ourselves: “I'm going to put in eight hours' worth of work, and then I'm going to put in eight hours' worth of 'me time', which will include my family, my hobbies, my workout, my everything,” says Anat Lechner, clinical associate professor of management at New York University. “I don't think it's such a simple formula.”
[C] And, according to new findings, it may not be. Some researchers are now encouraging us to stop thinking about work-life balance as an achievement that you either hit or don't. Instead, they suggest it may be more of a lifelong process—a continuous, never-ending exercise that requires self-awareness and timely adjustments. Researchers Ioana Lupu and Mayra Ruiz-Castro argue that work-life balance is “a cycle, not an achievement” In their 2020 study, the researchers interviewed nearly 80 employees at two London-based firms—an equal number of men and women between the ages of 30 and 50, all with at least one dependent child—who worked in middle or senior management roles.
[D] Although it sounds like the respondents had a lot in common, here's what separated them: about 30% of the men and 50% of the Women reported resisting working long hours. The other respondents, meanwhile, all worked long hours because they thought that's what successful professionals should do.
[E] Lupu and Ruiz-Castro looked at those who rejected the long hours and they found that those workers actually had strikingly similar strategies for maintaining their work-life balance. They had a tendency to reflect and question assumptions in the name of self-awareness and regularly took steps to adjust the things standing in their way to work-life balance.
[F] Lupu and Ruiz-Castro identified five steps that the respondents in the study who had better work-life balance used in their jobs. First, they paused and reconsidered beliefs such as “I'm a professional, so I should work, work, work”, and asked themselves questions like, “What's currently causing me stress?” Second, after identifying the cause, they zeroed in on their resultant emotions. Did they feel angry, sad, energised? Third, they reprioritised, asking “Is working long hours really worth cutting back on family time?”, for example. Fourth, they considered their alternatives: is there anything at work that could be changed to accommodate these new priorities? And finally, they implemented changes, like asking their supervisor for greater flexibility, or deciding not to take on every project that comes their way.
[G] This five-step process is something anyone can adopt. Going through the steps, and constantly checking in with yourself can help you shift and adapt your professional life to something that will better harmonise with your personal one. “Awareness of your emotional state is essential in order to determine the changes you want to make in your work and in your life,” says Lupu.
[H] New York University's Lechner agrees that finding that balance is an ongoing pursuit. It's not simply about dividing up the hours in your day between work, the gym, kids and chores. If the underlying emotional sources of stress are still there, then the time you actually spend at home may not be enjoyable. “We come home and even though physically we are there, mentally we still may be processing things that happened at work. We're not present,” she says. What we call “work-life balance” is actually just a substitute to having a sense of fulfillment and contentment.
[I] Of course, finding that balance probably shouldn't be something you have to do by yourself. Research by Erin Kelly, professor of work and organisation studies at MIT, shows companies and managers can play a key role in creating a better environment for workers. For her book Overload: How Good Jobs Went Bad and What to Do about It, she and co-author Phyllis Moen split more than 1,000 employees at a Fortune 500 company into two groups, one that worked under a management redesign and one that continued working within the existing management structure.
[J] Under the management redesign, many steps were taken to ensure better work-life balance and prevent burnout. Managers were regularly reminded to explicitly support their employees. Workers were allowed to make changes, like cancelling 9 am meetings. All of this was done in the name of increasing job satisfaction and giving workers greater flexibility, and to assure workers that it was something management was committed to. Unsurprisingly, Kelly and Moen found that employees in the redesign group reported less stress and less burnout. They were less likely to quit their jobs; indeed, over the next four years, they were 40% less likely to quit than those who kept working under the old policies.
[K] “Work-life balance is understood to be an individual's response, so people think 'it's up to me to manage the craziness of my work life'”, says Kelly. But organisations need to examine the demands they're placing on employees. “The root problem is not how the two pieces of work and life come together. It's that we have unrealistic expectations of what we're asked to do on the work side.” If your workplace isn't an environment where work-life balance is possible in the first place, any effort you attempt to make toward it on a personal level will be in vain.
[L] That's a conversation that appears to be gathering pace. The new prevalence of remote and flexible working models will likely all play important roles in how we balance our professional and personal lives. And if it seems like finding that perfect balance remains difficult to achieve, the experts say that keeping some perspective can help. For millions of people, work is about being able to put food on the table. Talking about work-life balance “is a very privileged conversation”, says Lechner. “If we're reflecting, maybe we should also reflect on that.”
36. According to a management expert, work-life balance is not as simple as giving equal amounts of time to work and personal life.
37. Research found that those who are given greater flexibility at work are less stressed and more likely to stay in their jobs.
38. Workers who rejected working long hours tended to make regular adjustments in order to achieve work-life balance.
39. Talking about work-life balance is said to be a privilege reserved for the better-off, not for those who barely make a living.
40. Knowing one's emotional state is of utmost importance in deciding what changes to make for a better work-life balance.
41. More female professionals reported being reluctant to work overtime than their male counterparts.
42. Without organisational support, any personal effort to maintain work-life balance will be unsuccessful.
43. The question of how to achieve work-life balance has long been the main subject of discussion among workers.
44. You may not actually experience emotional wellbeing at home if you remain occupied with what happened at work.
45. Some researchers suggest that work-life balance is not a goal to achieve, but a process for life to be adjusted promptly.
Answers & Explanations
36. B。解析:题干中的 giving equal amounts of time(给同等时间)对应 [B] 段的 I'm going to put in eight hours' worth of work, and then I'm going to put in eight hours' worth of 'me time'(我打算投入8小时工作,然后投入8小时‘我的时间’);题干中的 not as simple(并不简单)对应 [B] 段最后一句 I don't think it's such a simple formula(我不认为它有这么简单的公式)。
37. J。解析:题干中的 given greater flexibility... less stressed and more likely to stay in their jobs(被给予更大灵活性...压力更小且更有可能保住工作)对应 [J] 段的 giving workers greater flexibility... employees in the redesign group reported less stress... they were 40% less likely to quit(给员工更大的灵活性...受访员工报告压力减轻...他们辞职的可能性降低了40%)。
38. E。解析:题干中的 rejected working long hours... make regular adjustments(拒绝长时间工作...做定期调整)对应 [E] 段的 those who rejected the long hours... regularly took steps to adjust(那些拒绝长时间工作的人...会定期采取措施进行调整)。
39. L。解析:题干中的 privilege reserved for the better-off / barely make a living(这是为富人保留的特权/勉强糊口)对应 [L] 段的 privileged conversation / put food on the table(这是一种特权对话 / 对数百万人来说,工作是为了能把食物摆上桌(解决温饱))。
40. G。解析:题干中的 Knowing one's emotional state is of utmost importance in deciding what changes to make(了解自己的情感状态对于决定要做出什么改变至关重要)对应 [G] 段最后一句 Awareness of your emotional state is essential in order to determine the changes you want to make(意识到你的情绪状态对于确定你想做出的改变是必不可少的)。utmost importance 对应 essential。
41. D。解析:题干中的 More female... reluctant to work overtime than male counterparts(更多女性比男性抗拒加班/长时间工作)对应 [D] 段的 30% of the men and 50% of the Women reported resisting working long hours(30%的男性和50%的女性表示抗拒长时间工作)。
42. K。解析:题干中的 Without organisational support, any personal effort... will be unsuccessful(没有组织环境的支持,个人努力将不成功)对应 [K] 段最后一句 If your workplace isn't an environment where work-life balance is possible... any effort you attempt to make... will be in vain(如果你工作场所不支持平衡...你尝试做的任何个人努力都将是徒劳的)。unsuccessful 对应 in vain(徒劳的)。
43. A。解析:题干中的 main subject of discussion among workers(工人们讨论的主要话题)对应 [A] 段的 dominated discussion around careers for years(多年来主导了关于职业的讨论)。
44. H。解析:题干中的 experience emotional wellbeing at home if you remain occupied with what happened at work(如果你仍被工作所占据,在家里也无法感受到情感上的幸福)对应 [H] 段的 the time you actually spend at home may not be enjoyable... mentally we still may be processing things that happened at work. We're not present(你真正在家度过的时间可能并不愉快...我们在心理上可能仍在处理工作中发生的事情。我们不在状态)。
45. C。解析:题干中的 not a goal to achieve, but a process... adjusted promptly(不是一个要达成的目标,而是一个需要及时调整的过程)对应 [C] 段的 stop thinking about work-life balance as an achievement... more of a lifelong process... timely adjustments(停止将平衡视为一项成就...它更像是一个终身的过程...以及及时的调整)。
全文翻译
[A] 今年早些时候,当我考虑辞去一份有稳定收入和福利但让我大半时间感到痛苦的工作时,我经历了许多糟糕的日子,以至于我甚至没有精力在晚上看电视——我发现唯一能做的就是躺在地板上。我工作到了精疲力竭的地步。即使在家里,我们公司也期望我们参与"欢乐时光",但当我去那里时,我总是想着家里的工作。去年,倦怠是一个大话题,随着全面重返办公室在许多行业成为现实,工作与生活的平衡看起来像是一个即将破裂的泡沫。在疫情最严重的时候,我们都经历了一个没有通勤的、在家做更多事情的世界。[B] 现在在一个后疫情的世界里,许多人正在找回他们的通勤,发现自己回到了办公室,看着他们的工作与生活平衡在试图重新融入他们以前的存在时崩溃。正如作家 Anne Helen Petersen 所写,倦怠是由"工作太多,休息、时间、真正属于自己的体验或与亲近的人在一起的时间不够"造成的。
[C] 但工作与生活的平衡可能比你想象的更容易解决。虽然它是一个流行的概念,但我们忘记了"工作与生活平衡"是一个循环,而不是一个一次性成就。虽然倦怠是我们都希望避免的,但达到完美的工作与生活平衡往往是不可能的,而且倦怠和平衡都是周期和连续体的一部分,而不是二元状态。倦怠和平衡都是周期——你可能在一天、一周、一个月或一整个季度中处于任何一个。
[D] 如果你注意到自己正面临越来越大的倦怠风险,有一些方法可以让你自己——以及你的工作与生活平衡——回到正轨。一种方法是将睡眠作为非必需品进行一些调整。专家建议保持一致的睡眠时间表,每天在同一时间睡觉和起床。虽然这看起来很明显,但人们在倦怠时首先放弃的东西之一就是良好的夜间休息。然后我们也放弃了周末和假期。Petersen 在《Can't Even》一书中写道,我们将倦怠视为需要更多假期来解决的问题。假期当然有帮助,但问题是他称之为"可修复的生活"的东西——你每天、每周和每月围绕工作之外的内容创造结构的方式。
[E] 你可以建立的另一个习惯是弄清楚你的核心家庭价值观。想想什么对你的整个家庭最重要。例如,运动可能很重要,或者获得新鲜蔬菜和拥有一个花园可能是优先事项。一旦你决定了这些核心价值观是什么,它们的实践就成为可管理的,因为它们是日常节奏。它让时间变慢。你的生活有自己的节奏。你有让你做你所重视和喜欢的事情的实践。这些就是生活的目的。
[F] 还有其他一些小的改变可以产生巨大的影响。例如,确保你真正地休息。虽然打开笔记本电脑刷剧很有诱惑力,但如果你有喜欢做的项目,它们也可以是很好的减压方式。试着在你的周末中抽出一些时间做一些放松、有创意或让你快乐的事情,这样你就不会只是从你的工作电脑切换到你的娱乐电脑。即使你无法完全从倦怠中恢复过来,你做一些能给你带来快乐的事情也是必要的。
[G] 如果你因为想要实现完美的平衡而自责,那么重要的是要认识到完美的工作与生活平衡可能是一个神话,但值得作为生活中的事情之一来追求——即使你完全知道你可能永远无法实现它。我们所做的很多事情——包括工作——都与满足我们的需求有关,但工作与生活的平衡是关于确保我们的需求得到良好满足。毕竟,这整个有时让人感到压力的事情都是为了让我们自己朝着健康和快乐的方向发展。我们在生活中能做的最有价值的事情之一就是照顾我们的家人和我们自己。这就是为什么找到适合你的平衡很重要。
核心搭配与高分句型
【核心搭配与高频短语】
- put in:投入,花费(时间/精力)(put in eight hours' worth of work)
- in the name of:以...的名义,本着...的目的(in the name of self-awareness)
- zero in on:集中注意力于,专注于(zeroed in on their resultant emotions)
- cut back on:削减,缩减(cutting back on family time)
- take on:承担,接纳(任务/工作)(take on every project)
- be in vain:徒劳无功,白费力气(will be in vain)
- gather pace:加快步伐,加速发展(conversation that appears to be gathering pace)
- put food on the table:糊口,维持生计(work is about being able to put food on the table)
【亮点句型解析】
- What 引导的名词性从句 (表示“...的事物/状态”):
"Although it sounds like the respondents had a lot in common, here's what separated them:..."
(尽管听起来受访者有很多共同点,但这里是将他们区分开来的因素:...)`what separated them` 是一个非常地道的表达方式,使得语言更加紧凑有力,是四六级写作中引出关键差异的完美句型。 - It's up to sb. to do sth. (由某人决定/负责做某事):
"...people think 'it's up to me to manage the craziness of my work life'..."
(...人们认为“管理我疯狂的工作生活取决于我/是我自己的责任”...)该短语极具英语母语感,简洁地表达了“归因于个人责任”的意思。